ISSN 0320-961X (Print)
ISSN - (Online)

Для цитирования:

Соломатина Е. И. Из истории политической борьбы в архаическом Милете: проблемы датировки событий и интерпретации источников //Античный мир и археология. 2011. Т. 15, вып. 15. С. 15-24.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Полный текст в формате PDF(Ru):
(загрузок: 165)
Язык публикации: 
Тип статьи: 
Научная статья

Из истории политической борьбы в архаическом Милете: проблемы датировки событий и интерпретации источников

Соломатина Елена Ивановна, Институт всеобщей истории Российской Академии наук

The paper deals with the current state of scholar discussion concerning the dating of the events of political struggle in archaic Miletos and the interpretation of literary evidence. Generally speaking, there are two schools of thought about this matter. According to the traditional one the sequence of events may be presented in chronological order as follows: the struggle of the two Neleids for the throne which led to the downfall of the monarchy and the establishment of the oligarchy with elected offices, tyranny of Thrasyboulos, some political quarrel which brought Thoas and Damasenor to a short-term tyranny, then lengthy period of civil strife (“for two generations”) settled by a commission of Parians, who reestablished peaceful government (oligarchy) ca. 525 BC. The second one places the events in the following chronological order: the struggle of the two Neleids for the throne, the downfall of the monarchy and the establishment of oligarchy which concluded with the harsh rule of those who were colleagues with Thoas and Damasenor, a long period of civil unrest, then Parian arbitration and the establishment of prolonged oligarchical government, tyranny of Thrasyboulos, then again the oligarchy resumed ruling until ca. 540. As these topics are still being discussed, the author submits the arguments of the advocates of both theories to show the weak and strong points in their reasonings.

Ключевые слова: 
Список источников: 

Берве Г. Тираны Греции. Ростов-на-Дону, 1997.

Борухович В.Г. Архаический Милет (проблемы социальнополитической истории) // Проблемы политической истории античного общества. Л., 1985.

Виноградов Ю.Г. Политическая история Ольвийского полиса VII-I вв. до н.э.: Историко-эпиграфическое исследование. М., 1989.

Лаптева М.Ю. У истоков древнегреческой цивилизации: Иония XI-VI вв. до н.э. СПб., 2009.

Ehrhardt N. Milet und seine Kolonien. Vergleichende Untersuchung der kultischen und politischen Einrichtungen. Frankfurt am Main; Bern; N.Y., 1983.

Fontenrose J. The Delphic Oracle: Its Responses and Operations with a Catalogue of Responses. Berkeley, 1978.

Gorman R.J., Gorman V.B. "The Tyrants around Thoas and Damasenor" (Plut. Q.G. 32.298c-d) // CQ. 2000. Vol. 50.

Gorman V.B. Miletos, the Ornament of Ionia. A History of the City to 400 B.C.E. Ann Arbor, 2001.

Greaves A.M. Miletos: A History. L.; N.Y., 2002.

Huxley G.L. The Early Ionians. N.Y., 1966.

Jeffery L.H. Archaic Greece: The City-States, c. 700-500 B.C. N.Y., 1976.

Kawerau G, Rehm A. Milet. Bd. 1. Ht. 3: Das Delphinion in Milet. B., 1914.

Libero L. de, Die archaische Tyrannis. Stuttgart, 1996.

Lidell H.G., Scott R., Jones H.S. A Greek-English Lexicon. Oxf., 1985.

Parke H.W. Sibyls and Sibylline Prophecy in Classical Antiquity. L., 1992.

Поступила в редакцию: 
Принята к публикации: