ISSN 0320-961X (Print)
ISSN - (Online)


For citation:

Smykov E. V. Was there a ruler? Reflections on certain Aspects of the Career and Politics of the Triumvir M. Antony. Ancient World and Archaeology, 2017, vol. 18, iss. 18, pp. 165-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/0320-961X-2017-18-165-190, EDN: YLCLMP

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 73)
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Article
EDN: 
YLCLMP

Was there a ruler? Reflections on certain Aspects of the Career and Politics of the Triumvir M. Antony

Autors: 
Smykov Evgeniy Vladimirovich, Saratov State University
Abstract: 

The article is devoted to the consideration of the nature of the policy and political goals of the triumvir M. Antony. First of all, it is noted that he came from a family that did not have any political influence, or connections, whose members were involved in a number of scandals. Until Caesar's death, Antony was only the executor of his orders. After the death of the dictator, he became one of the leaders of the Caesarians, but he had no other support than the army. In 42–30 BC. he was closely associated with the eastern provinces of the Roman Republic. Despite this, the main direction of his policy has always remained Western, although after 36 BC. its dependence on eastern resources has increased dramatically. However, this does not give grounds for saying that his activities were deeply influenced by the political practice of Hellenistic monarchies. The analysis of numismatic data - the issues of coins of Antony, relating to his time in the East, inscriptions in his honor, data on his religious policy testifies that in general he remained within the framework of Roman political traditions. There are no serious grounds for talking about his “monarchism”, he was just as a Roman traditionalist as the other leaders of the Roman political groups of the time.

Reference: 

Ахиев С.Н., Смыков Е.В. «Контролируемый мятеж»: манипулирование толпой в  политике Марка Антония в марте - апреле 44 г. до н.э. // Народ и демократия в древности. Доклады российско-германской научной конференции. Ярославль, 2011. С. 200-213.

Бенгтсон Г. Правители эпохи эллинизма. М., 1982.

Бикерман Э. Государство Селевкидов. М., 1985.

Бокщанин А.Г. Парфия и Рим. М., 1966. Ч. 2.

Зарщиков А.В. Familiäres et amici в структуре цезарианской партии // Античность: общество и идеи. Казань, 2001. С 136-141.

Ильинская Л.С. Роль восточных провинций Рима в период гражданских войн конца республики // Древний Восток и античный мир. М., 1972. С. 208-224.

Короленков А.В. Гай Марий и Марк Антоний: от дружбы к вражде // История и историография зарубежного мира в лицах. Самара, 2011. Вып. 10. С. 12-22.

Машкин Н.А. Принципат Августа. Происхождение и социальная сущность. М.; Л., 1949.

Межерицкий Я.Ю. «Восстановленная республика» императора Августа. М., 2016.

Парфенов В.Н. От Цезаря до Августа. Саратов, 1987.

Свенцицкая И.С. Марк Антоний и малоазийские полисы // Социальная струк­тура и политическая организация античного общества. Л., 1982. C. 119­134.

Смыков Е.В. Антоний и Дионис (из истории религиозной политики триумвира М. Антония) // АМА. 2002. Вып. 11. С. 80-106.

Смыков Е.В. Марк Антоний и политика clementia Caesaris // АМА. 1990. Вып. 7. С. 56-65.

Смыков Е.В. Марк Антоний Критский - ординарный человек с неординарными полномочиями // Studia Historica. XII. 2012. С. 105-118.

Утченко С.Л. Древний Рим. События. Люди. Идеи. М., 1969.

Утченко С.Л. Политические учения древнего Рима. III-I вв. до н.э. М., 1977.

Ager Sh. Marriage or Mirage? The Phantom Wedding of Cleopatra and Antony / / ClPh. 2013. Vol. 108/2. P. 139-155.

Babelon E. Description historique et chronologique des monnaies de la république romaine. P.; Londres, 1885. Vol. 1.

Bengtson H. Zum Partherfeldzug des Antonius. München, 1974.

Bengtson H. Marcus Antonius: Triumvir und Herrscher des Orients. München, 1977.

Bicknell P.J. Caesar, Antony, Cleopatra and Cyprus // Latomus. 1977. T. 36/2. P. 325-342.

Broughton T.R.S. The Magistrates of the Roman Republic. N.Y., 1951. Vol. 1-2.

Buchheim H. Die Orientpolitik des Triumvirn M. Antonius. Heidelberg, 1960.

Cary M. A history of Rome down to the reign of Constantine. L., 1935.

Chamoux F. Marc Antoine - dernier prince de l’Orient Grec. P., 1986.

Crawford M. Roman Republican coinage. Cambr., 1974. Vol. I-II.

Crawford M. The Roman republic. Hassocks (Sussex), 1978.

Damon С., Mackay Ch.S. On the Prosecution of C. Antonius in 76 B.C. // Historia. 1995. Bd. 44/1. P. 37-55.

Dettenhofer M.H. Perdita Iuventus. Zwischen den Generationen von Caesar und Augustus. München, 1992.

Fischer R.A. Fulvia und Octavia. Die beiden Ehefrauen des Marcus Antonius in den politischen Kämpfen der Umbruchszeit zwischen Republik und Prinzipat. B., 1999.

Freybourger M.-L., Roddaz J.-M. (edd.). Dion Cassius Histoire Romaine Livres 48 et 49. P., 1994.

Gelzer M. Caesar. Der Politiker und Staatsmann6. Wiesbaden, 1983.

Gotter U. Der Diktator ist Tot! Politik in Rom zwischen den Iden des März und der Begründung des Zweiten Triumvirats. Stuttgart, 1990.

Grant M. A History of Rome. L., 1978.

Grant M. Cleopatra. N.Y., 1972.

Green P. Alexander to Actium: The historical evolution of the Hellenistic Age. Berkeley; Los Angeles, 1990.

Grueber H.A. Coins of the Roman Republic in the British Museum. L., 1910. Vol. 2.

Gruen E.S. The Last Generation of the Roman Republic. Berkeley; Los Angeles; L., 1974.

Hayne L. The political astuteness of the Antonii // L’Antiquité Classique. 1978. T. 47/1. P. 96-105.

Heinen H. The Syrian Egyptian Wars and the New Kingdoms of Asia Minor // CAH2. 1984. Vol. VII/1. P. 412-445.

Heinen H. Vorstufen und Anfänge des Herrscherkultes in Römischen Ägypten // ANRW. 1995. Tl. II. Bd. 18.5. S. 3144-3180.

Herbst R. Mytilene // RE. 1935. Bd. 16. Sp. 1411-1427.

Hölbl G. A history of Ptolemaic Empire. L.; N.Y., 2001.

Holmes T.R. The Architect of the Roman Empire. Oxf., 1928. Vol. 1.

Horne L. Images and insights: the provincial coinage of Mark Antony // Journal of the Numismatic Association of Australia. 2008. Vol. 19. P. 87-92.

Huslock F.W. Inscriptions from the Cyzicus District, 1906 // JHS. 1907. Vol. 27. P. 61-67.

Huzar E.G. Mark Antony. A Biography. Minneapolis, 1978.

Jeanmaire H.M. La politique religieuse d’Antoine et de Cléopatre // Revue archéologique. 1924. T. 19. P. 241-261.

Kienast D. Augustus: Prinzeps und Monarch. Darmstadt, 1992.

Kromayer J. Kleine Forschungen zur Geschichte des Zweiten Triumvirats. VI. Die Vorgeschichte des Krieges von Actium // Hermes. 1898. Bd. 33. S. 1-70.

Kuntz O. Legionare des Antonius und Augustus aus dem Orient // JhÖAI. Bd. 25. S. 70-81.

Ladon T. Mark Antony’s Forefathers. Comments on the Role of the gens Antonia in the Final Period of the Roman Republic // Marcus Antonius. History and Tradition / D. Slapek, I. Luc (eds.). Lublin, 2016. P. 131-146.

Michel D. Alexander als Vorbild für Pompeius, Caesar und Marcus Antonius. Archaologische Untersuchungen. Bruxelles, 1967.

Münzer F. Iulia (543) // RE. 1918. Bd. 10. Sp. 892-893.

Münzer F. Numitoria (8) // RE. 1937. Bd. 17. Sp. 1406.

Pelling C. The triumviral period // САН2. 1996. Vol. 10. P. 1-69.

Pelling C.B.R. Commentary // Plutarch. Life of Antony. Cambr., 1988.

Price S.R.F. Ritual and power: The Roman imperial cult in Asia Minor. Cambr., 1987.

Reinhold M. From Republic to Principate. An historical commentary on Cassius Dio’s Roman History books 49-52 (36-29 B.C.). Atlanta (Georgia), 1988.

Roberts A. Mark Antony. His life and his time. Worchestershire, 1988.

Roller D.W. Cleopatra. A Biography. Oxf., 2010.

Rossi R.F. Marco Antonio nella lotta politica della tarda Republica Romana. Trieste, 1959.

Scott K. The Political Propaganda of 44-30 B.C. // Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome. 1933. Vol. 11. P. 7-49.

Seaver J.E. Publius Ventidius. Neglected Roman Military Hero // CJ. 1952. Vol. 57/7. P. 275-300.

Smethurst S.E. Marc Antony - reluctant politician // Thought from the Learned Societies of Canada. Toronto, 1960. P. 155-170.

Strootman R. Queen of Kings: Kleopatra VII and the Donations of Alexandria // Kingdoms and principalities in the Roman Near East / T. Kaizer, M. Facella (eds.). Stuttgart, 2010. P. 140-157.

Strugnell E. Ventidius’ Parthian war: Rome’s forgotten eastern triumph // AAASH. 2006. Vol. 46. P. 239-252.

Syme R. The Roman revolution. Oxf., 1939.

Täger F. Charisma. Studien zur Geschichte des antiken Herrscherkultes. Stuttgart, 1960.

Tarn W.W. Antony’s legions // ClQ. 1932. Bd. 26. P. 75-81.

Tarn W.W., Charlesworth M.P. The Triumvirs // CAH. 1934. Vol. X. P. 31-65.

Tarn W.W., Charlesworth M.P. The War of the East against the West // CAH. 1934. Vol. X. P. 66-111.

Taylor L.R. The divinity of Roman emperor. Philadelphia, 1975.

Turner E. Ptolemaic Egypt // CAH2. 1984. Vol. VII/1. P. 118-174.

Valverde L.A. Inscripciones honorificas dedicadas a Pompeyo Magno // Faventia. 2001. Vol. 23/1. P. 87-102.

Wallmann P. Das Abkommen von Philippi: ein Diktat des Antonius? // SO. 1976. Bd. 51. S. 121-129.

Wallmann P. Triumviri Rei Publicae Constituendae. Untersuchungen zur politischen Propaganda im Zweiten Triumvirat. Frankfurt-am-Main; Bern; N.Y.; P., 1989.

Welch C. Antony, Fulvia, and the Ghost of Clodius in 47 B.C. // G&R2. 1995. Vol. 42/2. P. 182-201.

Wylie G.J. P. Ventidius - from “novus homo” to “military hero” // AClass. 1993. Vol. 36. P. 129-141.

Zanker P. The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus. Ann Arbor, 1988.

Received: 
17.06.2017
Accepted: 
15.10.2017
Published: 
20.12.2017